Top searches

PL

Resources

A fine and an administrative penalty at the same time: does this constitute a double punishment for the same thing?

26/08/2020

One of the principles of criminal law is that for one crime, an offender can only be sentenced once, for example, to a fine. However, in practice, it is often the case that in addition to a fine, a convicted person is also subject to another type of financial penalty. What is the reason for this?

An example of this can be the imposition of both a criminal fine and an administrative penalty under the Fiscal Penal Code and other legislation. For explanatory purposes, we refer to the Gambling Act. The Supreme Administrative Court indicated that there are no obstacles for the legislator to simultaneously establish a financial administrative penalty and a criminal fine in criminal and fiscal proceedings based on the same facts for the act of arranging a game without a license on slot machines outside a casino. Such a decision was possible because conducting gambling without a permit or license, or violating this permit or license, is prohibited under both the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act.

Interestingly, this decision was made regarding a person who did not own the gaming equipment or install it on his premises, but only rented out the part of the premises where the gaming machine was placed. The Supreme Administrative Court decided that the owner of the premises was actively involved in conducting the prohibited activity noting that if it were not for the lessor, it would not have been possible to conduct such activity in this place.

As the jurisprudence indicates, the “double” punishment of the same person for the same act, as in the above example, only seemingly violates the prohibition of double criminality. This is due to the different functions of criminal and administrative responsibility. It is emphasized that the purpose of an administrative penalty is principally to recover undue benefits, while the purpose of penalties imposed on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code is primarily to pay for breaking the law. According to the Constitutional Court, the concurrent punishment of a fine and an administrative penalty has been found to be consistent with the Constitution.

However, it should be remembered that any imposition of penalties on an entity must meet the requirements of proportionality. The determination of whether a penalty is proportionate depends on the individual circumstances of a case. In cases conducted on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act, the complexity is exacerbated by the need to also apply the provisions of EU law. This is, however, the subject for another article.

View more resources

Catch up on the very latest B2RLAW
announcements and news here.

24/06/2021

B2RLaw advises Kennet Partners and Digital+ Partners on their USD 30 million equity investment in eStoreMedia

B2RLaw has advised growth equity investors Kennet Partners and Digital+ Partners on their USD 30 million equity investment in Polish […]

MORE
14/06/2021

B2RLaw named Venture Capital Legal Advisor of the Year at the PSIK Awards 2021

B2RLaw is celebrating after being awarded Venture Capital Legal Advisor of the Year at the Polish Private Equity and Venture […]

MORE
09/06/2021

Edyta Zalewska joins B2RLaw’s Partnership, and six lawyers are promoted

B2RLaw has announced Edyta Zalewska as Partner in its 2021 promotion round, effective as of 1st May 2021. B2RLaw is also […]

MORE
11/05/2021

B2RLaw shortlisted as a finalist of the PSIK Awards 2021 for Venture Capital Legal Advisor of the Year

B2RLaw is pleased to advise that it has been selected as a finalist of the PSIK Awards 2021 for Venture […]

MORE
26/04/2021

B2RLaw advises PGNiG Ventures on investment in electromobility charger company Enelion

B2RLaw has advised PGNiG Group’s corporate venture capital fund on its investment in Enelion, a provider of comprehensive solutions for […]

MORE
25/04/2021

On the Ropes: Anti-Corruption and International Risk Perspectives from Recent Developments in Poland

In this edition of Ropes & Gray’s podcast series On the Ropes: Enforcement Risk Roundtable, litigation and enforcement partner, Amanda […]

MORE

Get in touch

Not sure who to contact? Let us help you find the right lawyer.

This site uses cookies to improve your experience More information.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close