Top searches

PL

Resources

A fine and an administrative penalty at the same time: does this constitute a double punishment for the same thing?

26/08/2020

One of the principles of criminal law is that for one crime, an offender can only be sentenced once, for example, to a fine. However, in practice, it is often the case that in addition to a fine, a convicted person is also subject to another type of financial penalty. What is the reason for this?

An example of this can be the imposition of both a criminal fine and an administrative penalty under the Fiscal Penal Code and other legislation. For explanatory purposes, we refer to the Gambling Act. The Supreme Administrative Court indicated that there are no obstacles for the legislator to simultaneously establish a financial administrative penalty and a criminal fine in criminal and fiscal proceedings based on the same facts for the act of arranging a game without a license on slot machines outside a casino. Such a decision was possible because conducting gambling without a permit or license, or violating this permit or license, is prohibited under both the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act.

Interestingly, this decision was made regarding a person who did not own the gaming equipment or install it on his premises, but only rented out the part of the premises where the gaming machine was placed. The Supreme Administrative Court decided that the owner of the premises was actively involved in conducting the prohibited activity noting that if it were not for the lessor, it would not have been possible to conduct such activity in this place.

As the jurisprudence indicates, the “double” punishment of the same person for the same act, as in the above example, only seemingly violates the prohibition of double criminality. This is due to the different functions of criminal and administrative responsibility. It is emphasized that the purpose of an administrative penalty is principally to recover undue benefits, while the purpose of penalties imposed on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code is primarily to pay for breaking the law. According to the Constitutional Court, the concurrent punishment of a fine and an administrative penalty has been found to be consistent with the Constitution.

However, it should be remembered that any imposition of penalties on an entity must meet the requirements of proportionality. The determination of whether a penalty is proportionate depends on the individual circumstances of a case. In cases conducted on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act, the complexity is exacerbated by the need to also apply the provisions of EU law. This is, however, the subject for another article.

View more resources

Catch up on the very latest B2RLAW
announcements and news here.

17/11/2020

B2RLaw short-listed in the category ‘Law Firm of the Year: Central Europe 2020’ by The Lawyer

We are pleased to advise that B2RLaw has been short-listed by the prestigious international legal magazine with the largest global […]

MORE
16/11/2020

B2RLaw advises on more venture capital deals in CEE than any other law firm in Q3 of 2020

In its first full three months since announcing its merger on 21st June 2020, B2RLaw has been ranked by Pitchbook […]

MORE
13/11/2020

B2RLaw advises the founders of WalkSee on an investment undertaken by EVIG Alfa Venture Capital

B2RLaw advised the founders of WalkSee sp.z o.o. on an investment made by EVIG Alfa Venture Capital into the company. […]

MORE
28/10/2020

B2RLaw launches Cannabis Practice

With growing client demand and a fast changing environment, B2RLaw has launched one of the first cannabis practices on the […]

MORE
23/10/2020

B2RLaw advised Life Science Innovation Fund on its investment in a healthtech startup

B2RLaw has advised the Life Science Innovation Fund on its investment in AIDLAB, a telemedical startup. The aim of the […]

MORE
19/10/2020

B2RLaw advised on another VC transaction in the video games industry

B2RLaw advised Apis Venture sp. z o.o., a venture capital fund from Warsaw, with regards its investment in Byte Barrel […]

MORE

Get in touch

Not sure who to contact? Let us help you find the right lawyer.

This site uses cookies to improve your experience More information.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close