Top searches

PL

Resources

A fine and an administrative penalty at the same time: does this constitute a double punishment for the same thing?

26/08/2020

One of the principles of criminal law is that for one crime, an offender can only be sentenced once, for example, to a fine. However, in practice, it is often the case that in addition to a fine, a convicted person is also subject to another type of financial penalty. What is the reason for this?

An example of this can be the imposition of both a criminal fine and an administrative penalty under the Fiscal Penal Code and other legislation. For explanatory purposes, we refer to the Gambling Act. The Supreme Administrative Court indicated that there are no obstacles for the legislator to simultaneously establish a financial administrative penalty and a criminal fine in criminal and fiscal proceedings based on the same facts for the act of arranging a game without a license on slot machines outside a casino. Such a decision was possible because conducting gambling without a permit or license, or violating this permit or license, is prohibited under both the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act.

Interestingly, this decision was made regarding a person who did not own the gaming equipment or install it on his premises, but only rented out the part of the premises where the gaming machine was placed. The Supreme Administrative Court decided that the owner of the premises was actively involved in conducting the prohibited activity noting that if it were not for the lessor, it would not have been possible to conduct such activity in this place.

As the jurisprudence indicates, the “double” punishment of the same person for the same act, as in the above example, only seemingly violates the prohibition of double criminality. This is due to the different functions of criminal and administrative responsibility. It is emphasized that the purpose of an administrative penalty is principally to recover undue benefits, while the purpose of penalties imposed on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code is primarily to pay for breaking the law. According to the Constitutional Court, the concurrent punishment of a fine and an administrative penalty has been found to be consistent with the Constitution.

However, it should be remembered that any imposition of penalties on an entity must meet the requirements of proportionality. The determination of whether a penalty is proportionate depends on the individual circumstances of a case. In cases conducted on the basis of the Fiscal Penal Code and the Gambling Act, the complexity is exacerbated by the need to also apply the provisions of EU law. This is, however, the subject for another article.

View more resources

Catch up on the very latest B2RLAW
announcements and news here.

03/10/2022

Is Poland Up to the Task on Ukraine? Three Arguments For and Against

On whether Poland will be able to live up to its ambition of becoming a defense sector and Ukraine reconstruction […]

MORE
30/09/2022

European response to cyberwar. NIS-2 – an opportunity for increased levels of cyber security?

More than two months ago, on 13 July, after a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and EU […]

MORE
26/09/2022

B2RLaw joins the EU VAT Expert Group

On September 12, the European Commission: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union published a list of members of the VAT […]

MORE
22/09/2022

B2RLaw as an official legal advisor and partner of the Polish Paddle Tennis Federation

According to the wording of the agreement signed on September, 2022, the B2RLaw law firm has become the official and […]

MORE
09/09/2022

B2RLaw on INCBA Europe Cannabis Business Expo: 10-11 September 2022 in Zurich

Join us on the very first conference of lawyers active in the cannabis industry in Europe ever: INCBA Europe Cannabis Business […]

MORE
11/07/2022

B2RLaw advises early stage technology company The Village Network on financing received by a group of investors including Credo Ventures, 500 Startup and Tilia Impact Ventures

B2RLaw has once again advised The Village Network, the Polish company behind Wioski.co, which is run by three female entrepreneurs, […]

MORE

Get in touch

Not sure who to contact? Let us help you find the right lawyer.

This site uses cookies to improve your experience More information.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close