Top searches

PL

Resources

How to limit your potential liability to the tax authorities. A closer look at the anti-avoidance clause.

07/08/2020

Everyone must comply with their responsibilities and public duties, including the payment of taxes, as specified by Article 84 of the Constitution. Poland has relatively strong measures to enforce compliance with tax obligations, and an example of this is the so-called anti-avoidance clause. This considers whether a legal or factual act was carried out in order to obtain a tax advantage and determines the amount of tax liability in accordance with the real nature of an act and not in accordance with what the taxpayer declared or demonstrated, regardless of other consequences, such as the possibility of initiating penal and fiscal proceedings.

However, the legal possibilities of the State are not unlimited and it is worth noting an existing limitation stemming from the statute, according to which, the anti-avoidance clause does not, in principle, apply to an entity which has obtained a protective tax ruling, to the extent covered by the ruling, until the effective date of the revocation or amendment of a protective ruling. It should be noted that there is a difference between a protective tax ruling and an individual tax interpretation because, in the case of individual interpretations, it is not possible for the authority to conclude that there are no grounds for applying the tax avoidance clause, and, furthermore, no interpretations appear to be issued regarding elements of the facts or future events which are reasonably foreseeable to be the subject of a decision under the anti-avoidance clause. An application for a protective tax ruling may relate not only to a planned action, but also to actions already initiated or carried out.

In order to avoid any negative consequences or potential disputes with the tax administration, any application should be submitted as early as possible. It is important to note that, despite the requirement to describe in detail all the circumstances of the act to be assessed, the interested party does not have to indicate the tax consequences, including financial benefits, resulting from the act covered by the application. The Supreme Administrative Court has also expressed such a position in one of its judgments.

One should be aware that merely submitting an application for a protective tax ruling does not prevent verification activities, tax inspections, tax proceedings or customs tax inspections being carried out. This instrument is not, however, particularly popular: by the end of 2019, only 9 decisions on protective rulings had been issued, three of which were negative, and the small number of entities which have used this instrument is probably due to the amount of the fee for an application for a protective ruling, which is PLN 20,000. Nevertheless, it is worthwhile considering this method of protection in specific cases.

Marcin Malinowski
Advocate

Jakub Przybyliński
Advocate Trainee

View more resources

Catch up on the very latest B2RLAW
announcements and news here.

04/03/2021

B2RLaw advises PE fund Pinova Capital on the acquisition of software company Raynet GmbH

B2RLaw has advised PE fund Pinova Capital on the Polish aspects of its acquisition of a majority stake of German […]

MORE
02/03/2021

B2RLaw advises Oben Group on its acquisition of plastic packaging group, Poligal

B2RLaw has advised Oben Group on its acquisition of Poligal Group. The acquisition includes BOPP and CPP production plants in […]

MORE
23/02/2021

B2RLaw advises Nuveen Real Estate and Value One on their entry to the Polish student housing market

B2RLaw is advising Eagle JVCo on its acquisition of a portfolio of purpose-built student housing with around 800 beds including […]

MORE
22/02/2021

B2RLaw – No.1 for Venture Capital in CEE in 2020 according to PitchBook

In its first year, B2RLaw has been ranked as the No.1 most active law firm for venture capital in Central […]

MORE
11/02/2021

B2RLaw advises fintech company SMEO on over PLN 21 million VC financing round

B2RLaw has advised FinTech company SMEO on a transaction involving capital injection into the company from international VC fund Finch […]

MORE
05/02/2021

B2RLaw advises on PLN 260 million Krakow residential project

B2RLaw Jankowski Stroiński Zięba & Partners has advised an international real estate developer on the acquisition of a residential project […]

MORE

Get in touch

Not sure who to contact? Let us help you find the right lawyer.

This site uses cookies to improve your experience More information.

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close